Chris, I added the missing SRU information on the bugs that were missing.
> The packaging itself looks sane, but my understanding is that this adds
> new classes of apparmor denials, and *particularly* it appears that this
> might cause existing apparmor profiles to deny application behaviour
> that is currently allowed (which is why the ABI patches are
> backported?).
Exactly.
> There don't seem to be any explicit tests in the test
> cases to verify that existing behaviour is preserved, though? That would
> seem to be necessary.
Chris, I added the missing SRU information on the bugs that were missing.
> The packaging itself looks sane, but my understanding is that this adds
> new classes of apparmor denials, and *particularly* it appears that this
> might cause existing apparmor profiles to deny application behaviour
> that is currently allowed (which is why the ABI patches are
> backported?).
Exactly.
> There don't seem to be any explicit tests in the test
> cases to verify that existing behaviour is preserved, though? That would
> seem to be necessary.
I created this MR on QRT to add this test case: /code.launchpad .net/~georgiag/ qa-regression- testing/ +git/qa- regression- testing/ +merge/ 433546
https:/
They are based on the Test Plan of Bug #1728130
The test added passes.