Comment 5 for bug 1824961

Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) wrote :

Traditionally we have actually put these accesses in the packages that ship the profile, like Marc said, because profilers may not want the profile to automatically have everything apport requires. These accesses should *not* be in the python abstraction because the accesses have nothing to do with python applications, they have to do with python applications with apport hooks that are confined with apparmor.

There was always the idea that perhaps we could create an apport abstraction and maybe move distro profiles to using it, but it isn't yet clear this is what we want to do since the accesses aren't fully understood.

For now, moving this back to kopanocore and adding an apparmor wishlist task.