Comment 5 for bug 1759346

These seem like counter arguments. On the one hand you seem to say that scrubbing is ok for ix and then change to suggest modifying ix to not scrub and introduce Ix.

This bug is really about an inconsistency between 'ix' for normal fork/exec where there is no scrubbing and 'ix' on aa-exec where there is scrubbing. IMO we should be consistent on how scrubbing is applied. I think we would break a lot of applications if we changed 'ix' to scrub by default (though, you don't seem to be suggesting that).

I'm not opposed to Ix but I'm not sure how useful it would be in practice....