Ubuntu
apparmor package

  1. Bug #1628285
  2. Comment #9

Comment 9 for bug 1628285

Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

> IMPORTANT: There is a known regression that may be seen by
> users of `lxc exec`. See bug #1641243 for details.

I don't see any mention of an lxc exec regression in bug #1641243. Please explain here what the known regression is, and why this is thought to be acceptable in an SRU.

Please also elaborate why support for loading apparmor profiles in a 14.04 container on a 16.04 host is an appropriate rationale for an SRU. Is this related to supporting snappy inside a 14.04 container? I understand the argument for supporting snappy on a 14.04 host; I'm less clear on the rationale for users to want snappy support in a 14.04 lxd container, as opposed to simply spinning up a 16.04 lxd container to get snappy support.