Comment 3 for bug 1435452

Revision history for this message
Steve Beattie (sbeattie) wrote :

To clarify, I mean that the existing dh_apparmor needs to be passed the profile name and potentially the package name as well as it has no means currently of discerning what those might be, which means there's no current way to get around requiring the packager to manually add the dh_apparmor call to the override_dh_install: target.