On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 08:32:17AM -0000, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> You might try to ask for a sync to -backports though.
The idea behind this bug is how to increase the usage of AppArmor. For now
only people running gutsy can install the latest version of AppArmor. I'd
like to make it simple for people running feisty to test AppArmor.
One strategy could be to provide deb packages for apparmor utilities from a
third party repository (from people.u.c for example). Could -backports be
used to achieved that ?
Also what about providing apparmor-modules-kernel_version for feisty kernels,
so that people don't have to compile the modules themselves ?
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 08:32:17AM -0000, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> You might try to ask for a sync to -backports though.
The idea behind this bug is how to increase the usage of AppArmor. For now
only people running gutsy can install the latest version of AppArmor. I'd
like to make it simple for people running feisty to test AppArmor.
One strategy could be to provide deb packages for apparmor utilities from a modules- kernel_ version for feisty kernels,
third party repository (from people.u.c for example). Could -backports be
used to achieved that ?
Also what about providing apparmor-
so that people don't have to compile the modules themselves ?