On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 21:39 +0000, Andrew Ross wrote:
> Is there a decision on this? It seems like it would be good to test it
> sooner rather than later.
>
> The only other option I can think of that's not been discussed is to
> create an antlr3.0 package which provides antlr3 and have the new
> package in main and the normal antlr3 in universe.
I think we should push this as-is into main - in order to support a
jython upgrade we need the later version there as well.
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 21:39 +0000, Andrew Ross wrote:
> Is there a decision on this? It seems like it would be good to test it
> sooner rather than later.
>
> The only other option I can think of that's not been discussed is to
> create an antlr3.0 package which provides antlr3 and have the new
> package in main and the normal antlr3 in universe.
I think we should push this as-is into main - in order to support a
jython upgrade we need the later version there as well.
Cheers
James
--
James Page
Ubuntu Server Developer