Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Let's go ahead with this update.
Great! Per SRU guidelines, I've uploaded an alsa-lib source package,
with the debdiff applied, to dapper-proposed.
> Is this sister project committed to deriving from Dapper? Typically it
> makes more sense to start from the most recent version, which will soon be
> Edgy.
I've just chatted with Cory, and he assures me that UbuntuStudio
(formerly Mubuntu) will derive from Edgy (to be precise: < _MMA_> Yes.
All our testing will be done with Edgy with an actual release planed for
+1). At the time (prior to more detailed consultation with him), I was
under the impression that 6.06.1 LTS had been chosen as the base.
Thanks,
- --
Daniel T. Chen <email address hidden>
GPG key: 0xC88ABDA3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Matt,
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Let's go ahead with this update.
Great! Per SRU guidelines, I've uploaded an alsa-lib source package,
with the debdiff applied, to dapper-proposed.
> Is this sister project committed to deriving from Dapper? Typically it
> makes more sense to start from the most recent version, which will soon be
> Edgy.
I've just chatted with Cory, and he assures me that UbuntuStudio
(formerly Mubuntu) will derive from Edgy (to be precise: < _MMA_> Yes.
All our testing will be done with Edgy with an actual release planed for
+1). At the time (prior to more detailed consultation with him), I was
under the impression that 6.06.1 LTS had been chosen as the base.
Thanks,
- --
Daniel T. Chen <email address hidden>
GPG key: 0xC88ABDA3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org
wFciKvaMRAnbFAJ 4gtt7STlT8NtnUN wgUNVBZqwizIwCg qhhv ylcodSD4=
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFFLFqce9G
vYpE7L7qkvwl1AG
=Sx6k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----