On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:16:23AM -0400, Daniel T. Chen wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > The update itself seems fine; my only reservation is that the original bug
> > doesn't seem serious enough to justify the inherent risk factors of an
> > update. It seems that it would affect only a very small number of users (on
> > particular hardware and doing stereo audio capture?).
>
> As Jeff mentioned in the follow-up to bug 62855, a significant number of
> "AC'97" users are affected. Considering that there is zero possibility
> of backward breakage by applying this fix for stereo audio capture and
Only a tiny fraction of users are likely to be using stereo audio capture at
all. With a little more context from the file, though, it seems clear that
only those users will be affected by the patch.
Let's go ahead with this update.
> that Ubuntu will soon have an audio-centric sister project, IMO it seems
> sensible to include this fix in dapper-updates.
Is this sister project committed to deriving from Dapper? Typically it
makes more sense to start from the most recent version, which will soon be
Edgy.
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:16:23AM -0400, Daniel T. Chen wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > The update itself seems fine; my only reservation is that the original bug
> > doesn't seem serious enough to justify the inherent risk factors of an
> > update. It seems that it would affect only a very small number of users (on
> > particular hardware and doing stereo audio capture?).
>
> As Jeff mentioned in the follow-up to bug 62855, a significant number of
> "AC'97" users are affected. Considering that there is zero possibility
> of backward breakage by applying this fix for stereo audio capture and
Only a tiny fraction of users are likely to be using stereo audio capture at
all. With a little more context from the file, though, it seems clear that
only those users will be affected by the patch.
Let's go ahead with this update.
> that Ubuntu will soon have an audio-centric sister project, IMO it seems
> sensible to include this fix in dapper-updates.
Is this sister project committed to deriving from Dapper? Typically it
makes more sense to start from the most recent version, which will soon be
Edgy.
--
- mdz