Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> The update itself seems fine; my only reservation is that the original bug
> doesn't seem serious enough to justify the inherent risk factors of an
> update. It seems that it would affect only a very small number of users (on
> particular hardware and doing stereo audio capture?).
As Jeff mentioned in the follow-up to bug 62855, a significant number of
"AC'97" users are affected. Considering that there is zero possibility
of backward breakage by applying this fix for stereo audio capture and
that Ubuntu will soon have an audio-centric sister project, IMO it seems
sensible to include this fix in dapper-updates.
Thanks,
- --
Daniel T. Chen <email address hidden>
GPG key: 0xC88ABDA3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Matt,
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> The update itself seems fine; my only reservation is that the original bug
> doesn't seem serious enough to justify the inherent risk factors of an
> update. It seems that it would affect only a very small number of users (on
> particular hardware and doing stereo audio capture?).
As Jeff mentioned in the follow-up to bug 62855, a significant number of
"AC'97" users are affected. Considering that there is zero possibility
of backward breakage by applying this fix for stereo audio capture and
that Ubuntu will soon have an audio-centric sister project, IMO it seems
sensible to include this fix in dapper-updates.
Thanks, enigmail. mozdev. org
- --
Daniel T. Chen <email address hidden>
GPG key: 0xC88ABDA3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFFIzWXe9G wFciKvaMRAh8wAJ 0RORGVib7NXgFVm BZIyW7NZ3GfXgCf aphf EvSTLtJ+ Certyw=
917RC+Yh/
=+UHT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----