Both must be identical from the code perspective.
But, looking at the verb sequence there, I doubt whether the 0xb020 call is really correct. If it follows the similar pattern as others, it should be rather setting the COEF index 0x26 instead, i.e.:
--- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c +++ b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c @@ -8345,7 +8345,7 @@ static const struct hda_fixup alc269_fixups[] = { .v.verbs = (const struct hda_verb[]) { { 0x20, AC_VERB_SET_COEF_INDEX, 0x24 }, { 0x20, AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF, 0x41 }, - { 0x20, AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF, 0xb020 }, + { 0x20, AC_VERB_SET_COEF_INDEX, 0x26 }, { 0x20, AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF, 0x2 }, { 0x20, AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF, 0x0 }, { 0x20, AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF, 0x0 },
Both must be identical from the code perspective.
But, looking at the verb sequence there, I doubt whether the 0xb020 call is really correct. If it follows the similar pattern as others, it should be rather setting the COEF index 0x26 instead, i.e.:
--- a/sound/ pci/hda/ patch_realtek. c pci/hda/ patch_realtek. c SET_COEF_ INDEX, 0x24 }, SET_PROC_ COEF, 0x41 }, SET_PROC_ COEF, 0xb020 }, SET_COEF_ INDEX, 0x26 }, SET_PROC_ COEF, 0x2 }, SET_PROC_ COEF, 0x0 }, SET_PROC_ COEF, 0x0 },
+++ b/sound/
@@ -8345,7 +8345,7 @@ static const struct hda_fixup alc269_fixups[] = {
.v.verbs = (const struct hda_verb[]) {
{ 0x20, AC_VERB_
{ 0x20, AC_VERB_
- { 0x20, AC_VERB_
+ { 0x20, AC_VERB_
{ 0x20, AC_VERB_
{ 0x20, AC_VERB_
{ 0x20, AC_VERB_