(In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #381)
> Sorry, it was a typo of AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF.
>
> In short, { 0x4XX, 0xYY } is equivalent with { AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF, 0xXXYY
> }
> and { 0x5XX, 0xYY } is a combo of { AC_VERB_SET_COEF_INDEX, 0xXXYY }
Maybe Takashi Iwai could enlight us on this issue? I'll make some other test and research...
(In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #381) SET_PROC_ COEF. SET_PROC_ COEF, 0xXXYY SET_COEF_ INDEX, 0xXXYY }
> Sorry, it was a typo of AC_VERB_
>
> In short, { 0x4XX, 0xYY } is equivalent with { AC_VERB_
> }
> and { 0x5XX, 0xYY } is a combo of { AC_VERB_
Maybe Takashi Iwai could enlight us on this issue? I'll make some other test and research...