On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 05:33:08PM -0800, Dan Chen wrote:
> --- Jan De Luyck <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Package: alsa-base
> > Version: 1.0.7-2
> > Followup-For: Bug #287499
> >=20
> > I just got bitten by this particular bug on a sarge
> > system, after=20
> > spending nearly two hours digging throug every
> > single aspect of the system=20
> > (except this). It should _definitely_ be marked more
> > visible than just=20
> > the README.Debian file.
>=20
> I agree with Thomas's proposal of a NEWS item. I
> presume both you and Bernhard use apt-listchanges and apt-listbugs?
So far I don't, thanks for the hint, I will check out those tools.
As for the NEWS item: When upgrading several hunderet packages,
I will not browse through the news of each of them.
The specific problem with this bug is,=20
that you are easily misslead where to search for the problem.
If I had known that the problem is within the alsa-base,
there would not have been so much wasted time.
Unless the average use behaves completely different then I do,
a NEWS item is not enough for this change.
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:41:19 +0100
From: Bernhard Reiter <email address hidden>
To: Dan Chen <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#287499: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#287499: alsa-base: causing confusion on systems with
oss
--6v9BRtpmy+umdQlo Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 05:33:08PM -0800, Dan Chen wrote:
> --- Jan De Luyck <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Package: alsa-base
> > Version: 1.0.7-2
> > Followup-For: Bug #287499
> >=20
> > I just got bitten by this particular bug on a sarge
> > system, after=20
> > spending nearly two hours digging throug every
> > single aspect of the system=20
> > (except this). It should _definitely_ be marked more
> > visible than just=20
> > the README.Debian file.
>=20
> I agree with Thomas's proposal of a NEWS item. I
> presume both you and Bernhard use apt-listchanges and apt-listbugs?
So far I don't, thanks for the hint, I will check out those tools.
As for the NEWS item: When upgrading several hunderet packages,
I will not browse through the news of each of them.
The specific problem with this bug is,=20
that you are easily misslead where to search for the problem.
If I had known that the problem is within the alsa-base,
there would not have been so much wasted time.
Unless the average use behaves completely different then I do,
a NEWS item is not enough for this change.
Bernhard
--6v9BRtpmy+umdQlo pgp-signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
g3dpKERYRAvXAAK CM9+SuxUFLAVVoy 9usQAXKJbYJMACd EW9/ D0E4T66g=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBB28RPh9a
Rr6FCFjCBH2YW02
=l1fK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6v9BRtpmy+ umdQlo- -