Sorry I have to disagree, Monkey, if the code is slow and I mean really slow then it should be notifying the desktop that it is slow by putting on the hour glass. This is not the case so the user is left wondering what the hell is going on. So they click the application again assuming that the program hasn't started.
Also some applications that are clicked don't even seem to ever start, its as if they have died silently.
Ignoring poor performing code just to get a bug counts down is not the way to better quality.
Sorry I have to disagree, Monkey, if the code is slow and I mean really slow then it should be notifying the desktop that it is slow by putting on the hour glass. This is not the case so the user is left wondering what the hell is going on. So they click the application again assuming that the program hasn't started.
Also some applications that are clicked don't even seem to ever start, its as if they have died silently.
Ignoring poor performing code just to get a bug counts down is not the way to better quality.