Wont update due to package adobe-flashplugin conflict

Bug #434158 reported by johnnyrootbeer
30
This bug affects 6 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client

Description: Ubuntu karmic (development branch)
Release: 9.10

When trying to upgrade system I get:
E: The package adobe-flashplugin needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive for it.
E: Internal error opening cache (1). Please report.

So I try to remove adobe-flashplugin in terminal and get:
:~$ sudo apt-get remove adobe-flashplugin
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: The package adobe-flashplugin needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive for it.

Reinstalling the package also didnt work. I tried it in terminal and also from synaptic and adobe web site.

I enabled the jaunty repositories to be able to work with synaptic package manager (since it wouldnt let me because it returned above error and closed) but since I'm running karmic Koala I was not able to reinstall or upgrade the system. I forced a (now) version of adobe-flashplugin using synaptic package manager but was still not able to upgrade the system the same error came up.

When I tried to autoremove command (sudo apt-get autoremove) the same error came up.
:~$ sudo apt-get autoremove
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libimage-exiftool-perl libgfortran3 libexiv2-5 python-numpy libgtkimageview0
  ufraw libblas3gf liblapack3gf libfreeimage3 exiv2
The following extra packages will be installed:
  adobe-flashplugin
Suggested packages:
  konqueror-nsplugins ttf-xfree86-nonfree xfs
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  exiv2 libblas3gf libexiv2-5 libfreeimage3 libgfortran3 libgtkimageview0
  libimage-exiftool-perl liblapack3gf python-numpy ufraw
The following packages will be upgraded:
  adobe-flashplugin
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 10 to remove and 137 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/4018kB of archives.
After this operation, 33.2MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
(Reading database ... 153798 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace adobe-flashplugin 10.0.22.87-1 (using .../adobe-flashplugin_10.0.32.18-1jaunty1_i386.deb) ...
update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin.
update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin.
dpkg: warning: old pre-removal script returned error exit status 2
dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin.
update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/adobe-flashplugin_10.0.32.18-1jaunty1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 2
postinst called with argument `abort-upgrade'
dpkg: error while cleaning up:
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/adobe-flashplugin_10.0.32.18-1jaunty1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

The error does not allow the removal of any other application, install new applications and update/upgrade the system. Therefore does not allow for security updates and thus is why I selected the check box as a security vulnerability. Hope this helps.

ProblemType: Bug
.home.star..cache.ubuntuone.log.syncdaemon.exceptions.log:

Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Sep 21 12:07:18 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: ubuntuone-client 0.95.1-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-10.34-generic
SourcePackage: ubuntuone-client
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-10-generic i686

Revision history for this message
johnnyrootbeer (johnnyrootbeer) wrote :
security vulnerability: yes → no
visibility: private → public
Rick McBride (rmcbride)
affects: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu) → adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
johnnyrootbeer (johnnyrootbeer) wrote :

I deleted all the "adobe-flashplugin" files I could find on the system and I was able to download ubuntu one (I had it before but was not working properly.). From what I learned, I was using adobe-flashplugin for jaunty and some of the dependencies were in conflict as I was running Karmic. Anyway Karmic would not let me update/upgrade or install new applications until adobe-flashplugin was reinstalled and then deleted. Unfortunately synaptic or the terminal werent able to delete whatever adobe files were conflicting. So I manually deleted every adobe-flashplugin file I could find. My system is back to "normal" now.

The only one problem I was left with is that I dont have an adobe-flashplugin to play youtube videos and gnash wont play them either. Terminal tells me:
Package adobe-flashplugin is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package adobe-flashplugin has no installation candidate

Changed in adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
Changed in adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Released → New
Revision history for this message
Pothikan Suresh (pothikan-gmail) wrote :

Got the solution:
---------------------
1. Removed the file /var/lib/dpkg/info/adobe-flashplugin.prerm
2. Ran "dpkg --force-all --remove adobe-flashplugin" to remove the flash-plugin completely.

Thanks for the solution provided by http://blog.ixti.ru/archives/6.

This bug can be duplicated to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/412944

Changed in adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.