The Debian package will keep a Recommends. This package requires the Google pepperflashplugins. The fact that pepperflashplugin-nonfree can be avoided by manually installing it explains why this is a Recommends instead of a Depends (i.e. users that really want can avoid the installation of pepperflashplugin-nonfree). But, for average users, the Recommends is good: by default, "apt-get install browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash" will give them a working flash plugin.
When reading this bug report, I agree that the Ubuntu package should have an alternative. If someone tries to use it with Debian (ie installing browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash and adobe-flashplugin but not pepperflashplugin-nonfree) and reports it works, I will also add it in Debian.
One should also probably check that there are proper Conflicts/Replaces between pepperflashplugin-nonfree and adobe-flashplugin (in particular in Ubuntu that provides both packages)
The Debian package will keep a Recommends. This package requires the Google pepperflashplugins. The fact that pepperflashplug in-nonfree can be avoided by manually installing it explains why this is a Recommends instead of a Depends (i.e. users that really want can avoid the installation of pepperflashplug in-nonfree) . But, for average users, the Recommends is good: by default, "apt-get install browser- plugin- freshplayer- pepperflash" will give them a working flash plugin.
When reading this bug report, I agree that the Ubuntu package should have an alternative. If someone tries to use it with Debian (ie installing browser- plugin- freshplayer- pepperflash and adobe-flashplugin but not pepperflashplug in-nonfree) and reports it works, I will also add it in Debian.
One should also probably check that there are proper Conflicts/Replaces between pepperflashplug in-nonfree and adobe-flashplugin (in particular in Ubuntu that provides both packages)