I was thinking about possibly to declare some package relationships to not allow the offending packages' combination to occur, when I came across the exact same thought from cpaelzer.
I don't know if you notice it, here it goes[0]:
"
One suggestion for the coming related uploads.
Do you think it would make sense to ensure that the now-known-bad
combinations of packages won't be allowed together.
Maybe when you go for adcli and sssd in LP #1868703 again - they might
have their dependency to libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit be versioned to
be greater or equal the fixed cyrus_sasl2?
"
Matthew do you have a plan to ensure the users will have the right combinations/package relationships ?
Matthew,
I was thinking about possibly to declare some package relationships to not allow the offending packages' combination to occur, when I came across the exact same thought from cpaelzer.
I don't know if you notice it, here it goes[0]:
" modules- gssapi- mit be versioned to
One suggestion for the coming related uploads.
Do you think it would make sense to ensure that the now-known-bad
combinations of packages won't be allowed together.
Maybe when you go for adcli and sssd in LP #1868703 again - they might
have their dependency to libsasl2-
be greater or equal the fixed cyrus_sasl2?
"
Matthew do you have a plan to ensure the users will have the right combinations/ package relationships ?
- Eric
[0]- https:/ /lists. ubuntu. com/archives/ ubuntu- server/ 2020-December/ 008613. html