ubuntu_demon wrote:
> * while disk temperature of 59 and 60 degrees don't change the apm.
60 seems to be a fairly common *maximum* operating temperature for
disks. Allowing it to rest at 59/60 seems like a bad idea.
Hitachi quote that (with their drives) for every degree you go above the
maximum temperature the failure rate rises 2-3%.
If your drive gets to 60 and stays there, you are leaving basically no
headroom and it may well rise above the maximum rating until your "fix"
notices and enables a power saving mode, which may well take some time
to bring the temperature down.
If your drive were rated for a maximum of 55 degrees and we allow it to
run at 60, the failure rate could potentially be 15% higher than normal,
all in the name of fixing something (head unparks) that probably wasn't
a problem in the first place.
FWIW, I forgot to mention in my previous post that the temperature
information is often also present in SMART output.
Hi
ubuntu_demon wrote:
> * while disk temperature of 59 and 60 degrees don't change the apm.
60 seems to be a fairly common *maximum* operating temperature for
disks. Allowing it to rest at 59/60 seems like a bad idea.
Hitachi quote that (with their drives) for every degree you go above the
maximum temperature the failure rate rises 2-3%.
If your drive gets to 60 and stays there, you are leaving basically no
headroom and it may well rise above the maximum rating until your "fix"
notices and enables a power saving mode, which may well take some time
to bring the temperature down.
If your drive were rated for a maximum of 55 degrees and we allow it to
run at 60, the failure rate could potentially be 15% higher than normal,
all in the name of fixing something (head unparks) that probably wasn't
a problem in the first place.
FWIW, I forgot to mention in my previous post that the temperature
information is often also present in SMART output.
--
Chris Jones