Steve Langasek [2009-04-28 3:47 -0000]: > I still think having acpi-support depend directly on pm-utils is more > appropriate than having gdm recommend it.
Did I say gdm? I meant acpi-support, of course, sorry.
Steve Langasek [2009-04-28 3:47 -0000]:
> I still think having acpi-support depend directly on pm-utils is more
> appropriate than having gdm recommend it.
Did I say gdm? I meant acpi-support, of course, sorry.