On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:29:54PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:36:18PM +0100, Jonathan David Amery wrote:
> > ...
> > Recompiling libacl1 (itself an awkward task since the package itself=20
> > segfaults in the middle when it is doing something to the postinst scri=
pt)
> > and installing the recompiled version fixes the problem.
> Given this statement, and the various others that suggest this may
> alternatively be a kernel ABI issue, I have no reason to believe
> theres actually anything wrong in the libacl package itself, nor
> is there likely to any workaround that could be put into libacl.
> As such, this bug is languishing assigned to libacl -- does anyone
> have any suggestions as to where/how further progress could be made
> on this bug? Is there a generic arm-port pseudo-package I could
> reassign to? Should I just close it stating a different compiler
> has resolved this (what compiler version was used above, Jonathan?)?
> Any advice/suggestions, anyone?
If it *is* a kernel ABI issue, it would be appropriate for the current
libacl1 package in sarge to include a preinst check for the running
kernel version to avoid installing a known-broken combination. Please
see the libc6 preinst for an example of this.
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
<email address hidden> http://www.debian.org/
--IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:30:01 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: Nathan Scott <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#312936: Programmes linked against libacl1 segfault in libacl1 code.
--IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:29:54PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:36:18PM +0100, Jonathan David Amery wrote:
> > ...
> > Recompiling libacl1 (itself an awkward task since the package itself=20
> > segfaults in the middle when it is doing something to the postinst scri=
pt)
> > and installing the recompiled version fixes the problem.
> Given this statement, and the various others that suggest this may
> alternatively be a kernel ABI issue, I have no reason to believe
> theres actually anything wrong in the libacl package itself, nor
> is there likely to any workaround that could be put into libacl.
> As such, this bug is languishing assigned to libacl -- does anyone
> have any suggestions as to where/how further progress could be made
> on this bug? Is there a generic arm-port pseudo-package I could
> reassign to? Should I just close it stating a different compiler
> has resolved this (what compiler version was used above, Jonathan?)?
> Any advice/suggestions, anyone?
If it *is* a kernel ABI issue, it would be appropriate for the current
libacl1 package in sarge to include a preinst check for the running
kernel version to avoid installing a known-broken combination. Please
see the libc6 preinst for an example of this.
--=20 www.debian. org/
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
<email address hidden> http://
--IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
ufymYLloRArDvAK Cnpz8p1Nmp7yLdb cf7sNXHgyiREACb BtGO NJPPP3jI=
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDCX75KN6
xwgNjZCoVPzr1cv
=1uIK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--IiVenqGWf+ H9Y6IX- -