Comment 22 for bug 19828

Message-ID: <20050822052954.GB1727@frodo>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:29:54 +1000
From: Nathan Scott <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#312936: Programmes linked against libacl1 segfault in libacl1 code.

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:36:18PM +0100, Jonathan David Amery wrote:
> ...
> Recompiling libacl1 (itself an awkward task since the package itself
> segfaults in the middle when it is doing something to the postinst script)
> and installing the recompiled version fixes the problem.

Given this statement, and the various others that suggest this may
alternatively be a kernel ABI issue, I have no reason to believe
theres actually anything wrong in the libacl package itself, nor
is there likely to any workaround that could be put into libacl.

As such, this bug is languishing assigned to libacl -- does anyone
have any suggestions as to where/how further progress could be made
on this bug? Is there a generic arm-port pseudo-package I could
reassign to? Should I just close it stating a different compiler
has resolved this (what compiler version was used above, Jonathan?)?

Any advice/suggestions, anyone?

thanks!

--
Nathan