> At the worst, you have to choose a session
> the very first time you log in on a different machine.
We have 300 Fedora machines in our department and they all get re-imaged every 6-months for the next release of Fedora. So, a user could potentially have to select their session 600 times per year :) Besides, they can't be expected to recall which machines they have logged in to. For all practical purposes they have to do it every time.
>Arguing for such in fedora's downstream bugzilla, however, is likely not a good >way to facilitate making that happen.
There doesn't appear to be an AccountsService mailing list but perhaps it would be better to file a bug report upstream?
Between this and the fact that the "user list" feature cannot be disabled, GDM is basically unusable in distributed environments. I suppose we should all just accept this and start using a different session manager or else start contributing to GDM upstream.
> At the worst, you have to choose a session
> the very first time you log in on a different machine.
We have 300 Fedora machines in our department and they all get re-imaged every 6-months for the next release of Fedora. So, a user could potentially have to select their session 600 times per year :) Besides, they can't be expected to recall which machines they have logged in to. For all practical purposes they have to do it every time.
>Arguing for such in fedora's downstream bugzilla, however, is likely not a good >way to facilitate making that happen.
There doesn't appear to be an AccountsService mailing list but perhaps it would be better to file a bug report upstream?
Between this and the fact that the "user list" feature cannot be disabled, GDM is basically unusable in distributed environments. I suppose we should all just accept this and start using a different session manager or else start contributing to GDM upstream.