On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:12:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Therefore, I think the biggest question for us is:
>=20
> 1) Do the default protections that attach to trademarks, even when
> unregistered and unmentioned (not even with a "(TM)"), infringe upon t=
he
> freedoms the DFSG purports to defend?
I suspect that strictly as stated, no. Trademark dilution will stop
this for most works - anything which has been repeatedly branched in
the past, for example. You would have real trouble defending a
trademark on 'glibc', 'gcc', or 'emacs' at this point.
However, there almost certainly exist scenarios in which trademarks
can be an issue.
> In lieu of pursuing all of the above questions exhaustively, I propose the
> following:
>=20
> P1) Adopt a kind of don't-ask, don't-tell policy regarding implicit
> trademarks. Many free software developers don't give a whit about
> trademarks, and some don't even care how much their software is patch=
ed
> by third parties while retaining the name. So, if you maintain a
> package that doesn't assert any trademarks, don't worry about it.
For the above reasons I'm inclined to agree that this is safe.
> P2) If a package does assert a trademark, contact the mark holder and ask
> for a trademark license that permits usage of the marks under the same
> terms as the copyright license that has been attached to the
> corresponding work, wherever applicable.
As with abiword, the main thrust here is:
"Can I call a modified version foo, even when you don't like the
modified version?"
So that makes a good opener for people with no comprehension of
trademarks; it'll rapidly categorise them into people who are and are
not willing to grant a free license.
(Answer appears to be 'no' for abiword; DFSG aside, we can't really
afford to distribute it with trademarks intact)
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:22:55 +0100
From: Andrew Suffield <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: AbiWord, trademarks, and DFSG-freeness
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:12:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Therefore, I think the biggest question for us is:
>=20
> 1) Do the default protections that attach to trademarks, even when
> unregistered and unmentioned (not even with a "(TM)"), infringe upon t=
he
> freedoms the DFSG purports to defend?
I suspect that strictly as stated, no. Trademark dilution will stop
this for most works - anything which has been repeatedly branched in
the past, for example. You would have real trouble defending a
trademark on 'glibc', 'gcc', or 'emacs' at this point.
However, there almost certainly exist scenarios in which trademarks
can be an issue.
> In lieu of pursuing all of the above questions exhaustively, I propose the
> following:
>=20
> P1) Adopt a kind of don't-ask, don't-tell policy regarding implicit
> trademarks. Many free software developers don't give a whit about
> trademarks, and some don't even care how much their software is patch=
ed
> by third parties while retaining the name. So, if you maintain a
> package that doesn't assert any trademarks, don't worry about it.
For the above reasons I'm inclined to agree that this is safe.
> P2) If a package does assert a trademark, contact the mark holder and ask
> for a trademark license that permits usage of the marks under the same
> terms as the copyright license that has been attached to the
> corresponding work, wherever applicable.
As with abiword, the main thrust here is:
"Can I call a modified version foo, even when you don't like the
modified version?"
So that makes a good opener for people with no comprehension of
trademarks; it'll rapidly categorise them into people who are and are
not willing to grant a free license.
(Answer appears to be 'no' for abiword; DFSG aside, we can't really
afford to distribute it with trademarks intact)
--=20 www.debian. org/ |
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://
`. `' |
`- -><- |
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
lpK98RSteX8RAmV /AKCBpraSMV5CPu pYOfh4uVlhrI1pc gCfZ8Ei ifOIbo2s=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBb6T/
Wyte07IoykqIQeF
=8Vep
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--XsQoSWH+ UP9D9v3l- -