On 08/12/2009 11:31 PM, Colin Dean wrote:
> Here's my first attempt at making a package from source. The newest
> version of the source available is 2.0.1. I've put in request that the
> source for 2.0.2 be released (they're more than a month late posting
> it).
>
> This is a BINARY package compiled for amd64.
>
> I'll have a i386 version when I finish figuring out how to build debian
> source packages.
>
> Right now, the dependencies are the same as Firefox, even though only
> libc6 is specified as a dependency.
>
> A SOURCE PACKAGE WILL COME WHEN I GET IT BUILT. Please just test this
> package so I know that my compile worked.
>
Why not just build source package using the -s -sa options and push to
PPA that will build 386 64 and lpia for you
On 08/12/2009 11:31 PM, Colin Dean wrote:
> Here's my first attempt at making a package from source. The newest
> version of the source available is 2.0.1. I've put in request that the
> source for 2.0.2 be released (they're more than a month late posting
> it).
>
> This is a BINARY package compiled for amd64.
>
> I'll have a i386 version when I finish figuring out how to build debian
> source packages.
>
> Right now, the dependencies are the same as Firefox, even though only
> libc6 is specified as a dependency.
>
> A SOURCE PACKAGE WILL COME WHEN I GET IT BUILT. Please just test this
> package so I know that my compile worked.
>
Why not just build source package using the -s -sa options and push to
PPA that will build 386 64 and lpia for you
--
Sincerely Yours,
John Vivirito
https:/ /launchpad. net/~gnomefreak /wiki.ubuntu. com/JohnVivirit o
https:/
Linux User# 414246
"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
-- Metallica from Unforgiven III