On Friday 02 July 2004 07:37, you wrote:
> Hi,
> i can't reproduce this problem at all with today's sid.
> Are you sure you are not pulling in some packages from experimental
> that might lead to the FTBFS?
I just figured it out. You need to use autoconf2.50 instead of autoconf=20
(or Build-Conflict: autoconf2.13) and use aclocal-1.7 and automake-1.7=20
instead of just aclocal and automake.
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:35:17 +0000
From: "Brian M\. Carlson" <email address hidden>
To: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#257237: (no subject)
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Friday 02 July 2004 07:37, you wrote:
> Hi,
> i can't reproduce this problem at all with today's sid.
> Are you sure you are not pulling in some packages from experimental
> that might lead to the FTBFS?
I just figured it out. You need to use autoconf2.50 instead of autoconf=20
(or Build-Conflict: autoconf2.13) and use aclocal-1.7 and automake-1.7=20
instead of just aclocal and automake.
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBQOWc3uW R/8lWBVPnAQFHnw f/RxoVcQ0BbxpIW uOANUvcV2HTUYAv IijT MmR+d4qhidi2E8Q zbYgT9tngDZlwzc z31bEsifn2LsuQu QTcE+T FhhOJpyaU7oyEsr EHzuTNWvjTYVSLa lTQOH12GbnzVyMi yQzf wPK2BSAaI4l1AHY 3XRUK7a6lfri/ ra85QvuZzhRaCjV 2kL7VRQGo WUPSYV1yhTRp7Ba zbRe/+3keFWpLaN m2niB57nhdsyvDw auxMh+I 5V+28+9IwKjplZB F84fLBLmEXq6VQ4 uCRvYTVLQ= 3D=3D
dNAtVQLD7BKF/
I1z8QT0W9Peb01Q
LtBKwYz2NXx/
VOnbj/enpEI/
U1l3aWYwZwmCEVV
=3DFrQp
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----