Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 10:35:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Richard A Nelson <email address hidden>
To: Andrew Saunders <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#248853: 3270: 5250 emulation code, all rights reserved
> The copyright holder of the 5250 emulation code appears to have
> granted no permissions whatsoever; there is just the bare copyright
> declaration on its own. Since copyright law works on the basis that
> pretty much all rights are reserved (barring fair use etc) unless
> expressly stated otherwise, the 5250 emulation code and all code that
> could be considered to have been derived from it are most definitely
> not legally distributable by Debian.
>
> Similarly, the portions of code copyrighted by Georgia Tech Research
> Corporation are not distributable either, since the only right
> explicitly granted is that to "public use" (whatever that means).
>
> IMO, the 3270 packages should be removed from the archive immediately.
Sigh... did you not notice from which pool this came ?
I'm all for constructive criticism; something I can take to upstream -
and he has done some work to improve the situation based upon earlier
conversations. However, knee-jerk responces (like this) will be simply
routed to /dev/null.
If you wish to be helpful, I'll be happy to blast the copyright info
to debian-legal for further critique. If you wish to just blather,
consider this a *plonk*.
--
Rick Nelson
This is the solution to Debian's problem .. and since the only real way
to create more relatives of developers is to have children, we need more
sex! It's a long term investment ... it's the work itself that is
satisfying!
-- Craig Brozefsky
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 10:35:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Richard A Nelson <email address hidden>
To: Andrew Saunders <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#248853: 3270: 5250 emulation code, all rights reserved
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Andrew Saunders wrote:
> Package: 3270 packages. debian. org/changelogs/ pool/non- free/3/ 3270/3270_ 3.3.2p1- 1/copyright ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --^^^^^ ^^^^--- ------- ------- ------- ---
> Version: all
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.3
>
> See the license terms here:
>
> http://
-------
> The copyright holder of the 5250 emulation code appears to have
> granted no permissions whatsoever; there is just the bare copyright
> declaration on its own. Since copyright law works on the basis that
> pretty much all rights are reserved (barring fair use etc) unless
> expressly stated otherwise, the 5250 emulation code and all code that
> could be considered to have been derived from it are most definitely
> not legally distributable by Debian.
>
> Similarly, the portions of code copyrighted by Georgia Tech Research
> Corporation are not distributable either, since the only right
> explicitly granted is that to "public use" (whatever that means).
>
> IMO, the 3270 packages should be removed from the archive immediately.
Sigh... did you not notice from which pool this came ?
I'm all for constructive criticism; something I can take to upstream -
and he has done some work to improve the situation based upon earlier
conversations. However, knee-jerk responces (like this) will be simply
routed to /dev/null.
If you wish to be helpful, I'll be happy to blast the copyright info
to debian-legal for further critique. If you wish to just blather,
consider this a *plonk*.
--
Rick Nelson
This is the solution to Debian's problem .. and since the only real way
to create more relatives of developers is to have children, we need more
sex! It's a long term investment ... it's the work itself that is
satisfying!
-- Craig Brozefsky