Comment 0 for bug 550375

Hi,

that's our current state:
http://orangesquash.org.uk/~laney/haskell-installability/i386.png

Here's the list of syncs that I filed today together with some comments how
invasive the changes are. Common to most packages is that the packaging
changed to make use of hlibrary.mk.

haskelldb-hdbc: 0.12-1 to 0.13-1 (bug #)
Upstream changes: minimal as well.

missingh: 1.1.0.1-1 to 1.1.0.3-1 (bug #550208)
Upstream changes: mediocre.

haskell-unixutils: 1.22-1build1 to 1.22-2 (bug #)

hdbc-odbc: 2.1.0.0-3ubuntu1 to 2.2.3.0-2 (bug #)
Upstream changes: quite limited.

hdbc-postgresql: 2.1.0.1-1 to 2.2.3.1-2 (bug #)
Upstream changes: mediocre.
Debatable: -2 changes the name of the -doc package. -1 is still available in
testing, so we could also sync this one.

hdbc-sqlite3: 2.1.0.2-1 to 2.3.0.0-2 (bug #)
Upstream changes: minimal.
Debatable: -2 changes the name of the -doc package. -1 is still available in
testing, so we could also sync this one.

haskell-configfile: 1.0.5-1build1 to 1.0.6-1 (bug #550223)
Upstream changes: only 3 lines, one is the version number.
Needs newer missingh first.

darcs-buildpackage: 0.5.12 to 0.5.12.1 (bug #550246).
Needs missingh and haskell-configfile first.

I've test-build and test-installed all packages. I've also looked at the
debdiffs of the versions, and all look good, though I must admit that my haskell
is a little bit rusted.
Finally I gave darcs-buildpackage and hdbc-sqlite3 brief tests.

Oh, and I also looked at the contents of the binary packages to avoid surprises.
The only interesting bit that I found is that configfile-doc (from
haskell-configfile) is empty. However that's not a regression.

Comments, questions, anything else?

Cheers,
   Stefan.