Hm, do your user2's directories have the same permissions as mine?
Or are your directories of user2 "group writeable"? It would be OK for them not to have a lock emblem then, if you are browsing as user1 and member in the user2 group.
Further details on the issue I observe:
* The theme used in ubuntu is just called "Human" not "humanity".
* In the *symbol view*, I see the Desktop/ with lock emblem in the upper right corner (correct with the above mentioned perms) *and* private/ with the lock-emblem (not correct). The private/ directory has a X emblem in the lower right corner (correct).
* In the *list view*, the X-emblem for private/ is not shown (but wrongly a lock emblem). Maybe the wrongly set lock symbol is overlaying the x emblem in the list view?
Hm, do your user2's directories have the same permissions as mine?
Or are your directories of user2 "group writeable"? It would be OK for them not to have a lock emblem then, if you are browsing as user1 and member in the user2 group.
Further details on the issue I observe:
* The theme used in ubuntu is just called "Human" not "humanity".
* In the *symbol view*, I see the Desktop/ with lock emblem in the upper right corner (correct with the above mentioned perms) *and* private/ with the lock-emblem (not correct). The private/ directory has a X emblem in the lower right corner (correct).
* In the *list view*, the X-emblem for private/ is not shown (but wrongly a lock emblem). Maybe the wrongly set lock symbol is overlaying the x emblem in the list view?