Comment 32 for bug 420513
Revision history for this message
| David Sugar (dyfet-deactivatedaccount) wrote | #32 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
Lol! While I appreciate the vote of confidence, the goal was NEVER to have a dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise!
I think what Scott says about some form of formalizing governance is actually very correct. However, the meta package (any meta-package instance) has a "snapshot" instance of the seed; it does not pull or re-germinate it when it builds. Hence, as long as it is safe at the time of submission, a given update of the package will be safe, well, at least for the current one. Also, we could setup a separate release subteam that is not open commit, and have it moved to there. I think we should hold a quick IRC meeting in any case to ratify some basic governance...