On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:22:53PM -0000, Matthew East wrote:
> Public bug report changed:
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/31775
>
> Comment:
> Another last quick idea on this. In fact, the documentation on
> http://help.ubuntu.com identically reproduces the documentation
> available in the distribution (except without all the extra system
> stuff) - so really two separate entries for this are not necessary,
> especially considering as Jane mentioned that one is unavailable to our
> offline users.
If the help.ubuntu.com content will always be identical to the ubuntu-docs
content, what is its purpose? I assumed it would be more frequently
updated.
Note that during the UI sprint, it was proposed that the link should be
specific to Dapper (e.g., http://help.ubuntu.com/6.04), so that we can
permanently present the Dapper content there as the documentation evolves
for future releases.
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:22:53PM -0000, Matthew East wrote: /launchpad. net/malone/ bugs/31775 help.ubuntu. com identically reproduces the documentation
> Public bug report changed:
> https:/
>
> Comment:
> Another last quick idea on this. In fact, the documentation on
> http://
> available in the distribution (except without all the extra system
> stuff) - so really two separate entries for this are not necessary,
> especially considering as Jane mentioned that one is unavailable to our
> offline users.
If the help.ubuntu.com content will always be identical to the ubuntu-docs
content, what is its purpose? I assumed it would be more frequently
updated.
Note that during the UI sprint, it was proposed that the link should be help.ubuntu. com/6.04), so that we can
specific to Dapper (e.g., http://
permanently present the Dapper content there as the documentation evolves
for future releases.
--
- mdz