The package in http://oem.archive.canonical.com/pool/public/libf/libfprint-2-tod1-goodix/ indeed looks better and has contents (ships .so, and hence the binary deps).
The one in the queue looks incomplete, and I guess should be rejected, as it is effectively empty.
The package in http:// oem.archive. canonical. com/pool/ public/ libf/libfprint- 2-tod1- goodix/ indeed looks better and has contents (ships .so, and hence the binary deps).
The one in the queue looks incomplete, and I guess should be rejected, as it is effectively empty.