Comment 2 for bug 1546967

Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote : Re: [FFe] [needs-packaging] linux backports and related meta packages

some comments:

- 'backports' is a generic name, so even though upstream uses that for the tarball I think the source package should be named 'linux-backports' (and the lp project too, maybe too late for that :)
- empty d/docs file
- can't build a source package by just bumping the abi.. claims I don't have the headers installed which I do