Log in / Register
Ubuntu
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1118626
Comment #2
Comment 2 for bug 1118626
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko)
wrote
on 2013-02-07
:
#2
wrong. this should be a separate *source* package. or better don't use libiberty but gnulib instead.
wrong. this should be a separate *source* package. or better don't use libiberty but gnulib instead.
wrong. this should be a separate *source* package. or better don't use libiberty but gnulib instead.