Comment 18 for bug 1913266

------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2021-02-09 09:36 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #33)
> <email address hidden> 2021-02-02 04:43 EDT:
> > Christian,
> > the version I sent to the mailing list should work without Michals patches.
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2021-January/msg01149.html
>
> Hi,
> this also still is very very noisy vs e.g. the libvirt 6.0 that is in Focal.
> E.g. src/qemu/qemu_validate.c doesn't exist yet since 906fddf73 is in
> >v6.3.0.
> I could backport it just looking at the code, but you have the experience as
> the author and a machine that can actually execute this. Hence I'd ask you
> to provide suggested backports (I'll do the packaging, just a git commit
> with the change that you envision) on top of those two branches:
> - F:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+git/
> libvirt/+ref/applied/ubuntu/focal-devel
> - G:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+git/
> libvirt/+ref/applied/ubuntu/groovy-devel
>
> Those not only are on the versions the Ubuntu releases are on, but also have
> all the Ubuntu Delta that usually is applied in packaging applied.
> If you want to provide a patch here or point me to a commit/branch somewhere
> is up to you.

I have attached patches for focal and groovy.
The two patches have been successfully build and passed the mocked libvirt checks. Libvirts syntax-check seems pretty much as broken as before. :D