Comment 6 for bug 1892849
Revision history for this message
| bugproxy (bugproxy) wrote Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla | #6 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
4d1350f
(Get the code!)
------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2020-09-01 04:30 EDT-------
Ok I've tested the proposed kernel and also looked at the sources in the focal Kernel repository. Sadly it looks like we missed adding the following upstream commit.
b76fee1bc56c31a
I mentioned this commit in my original request but erroneously stated that it was part of Bug 1891437. Sadly that is not correct as while that commit fixes a related issue it actually came a bit later. Would it be possible to still add it as part of this Bug or should I create a new one?
The problem description in this bug is actually fixed without that commit, and I verified this with the 5.4.0-46-generic kernel from proposed. The same is true for the problem described in 1891437 but it's closely related to both of them and I actually didn't expect the commits to even apply without it.
As with the others the missed commit is also CC stable of course.