This bug is going on three years old! Do you know how many posts (since May 2010) on ubuntuforums.org have asked what is wrong with 64-bit Ubuntu that it is not recommended? And if something's wrong with 64-bit, how can 32-bit be much better?
"Hopefully" a warning will appear directing UEFI users away from 32-bit.
This bug is going on three years old! Do you know how many posts (since May 2010) on ubuntuforums.org have asked what is wrong with 64-bit Ubuntu that it is not recommended? And if something's wrong with 64-bit, how can 32-bit be much better?
"Hopefully" a warning will appear directing UEFI users away from 32-bit.