Comment 2 for bug 1518284

Revision history for this message
Antoine Motte dit Falisse (antoinemotteditfalisse) wrote :

Maybe you can replace the X³ because there is a X^ available, it's a bit redundant.

There is a weird priority accorded to very specific and rare functions (like Mod, or e^n) : It's a pocket calculator, it's mainly to do quick and daily maths... like a percent reduction on something ;-)

People who actually use e^n or mod functions use probably something more powerful and adapted to scientific maths...