(In reply to comment #90)
> So anyone object to removing 65-nonlatin.conf from conf.d/ ?
> (If some distro still wants it they could symlink it from avail.d/.)
>
> Otherwise at minimum I think we need lang tags in 65-nonlatin.conf.
>
I think it is a bad idea. As I said several times previously, 65-nonlatin.conf is not for specific languages. It only provides sufficient font fallback (to prevent fontconfig randomly picking up low quality fonts) for rendering CJK char under a non-CJK specific environment (such as en_US, fr etc).
For CJK-specific configs, they should go to the 65-language-ja.conf or 65-language-zh.conf file as in my "65-nonlatin test suite".
What we need is a BETTER 65-nonlatin, removing from conf.d or adding lang tag miss the point completely.
(In reply to comment #90)
> So anyone object to removing 65-nonlatin.conf from conf.d/ ?
> (If some distro still wants it they could symlink it from avail.d/.)
>
> Otherwise at minimum I think we need lang tags in 65-nonlatin.conf.
>
I think it is a bad idea. As I said several times previously, 65-nonlatin.conf is not for specific languages. It only provides sufficient font fallback (to prevent fontconfig randomly picking up low quality fonts) for rendering CJK char under a non-CJK specific environment (such as en_US, fr etc).
For CJK-specific configs, they should go to the 65-language-ja.conf or 65-language-zh.conf file as in my "65-nonlatin test suite".
What we need is a BETTER 65-nonlatin, removing from conf.d or adding lang tag miss the point completely.