On Fri, Aug 02, 2013, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >* use stat() on the file to get a meaningful date and display that (more
> >meaningful to an end-user)
> Would that show the date the update was applied, or the actual release date of
> the last upgrade? Also, this may not provide a meaningful reference point if
> we can't use the same information regarding the target build that the upgrade
> will leave you in. In the latter case, currently *all* we know is the build
> number.
stat() should show the date the upgrade was assembled on the server (I
guess it's part of the version tarball. The recovery unpacking should
preserve timestamps (or it's a bug we should fix).
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >* use stat() on the file to get a meaningful date and display that (more
> >meaningful to an end-user)
> Would that show the date the update was applied, or the actual release date of
> the last upgrade? Also, this may not provide a meaningful reference point if
> we can't use the same information regarding the target build that the upgrade
> will leave you in. In the latter case, currently *all* we know is the build
> number.
stat() should show the date the upgrade was assembled on the server (I
guess it's part of the version tarball. The recovery unpacking should
preserve timestamps (or it's a bug we should fix).
I don't understand your second point
--
Loïc Minier