Comment 2 for bug 2061891

Hi Nick and Julian,

Thanks for the fix and SRU template!

Question:

IIUIC, the fix simply removes 'ufw' if '{iptables,netfilter}-persistent' is installed.

But is it possible that removing ufw is the wrong thing to do in some particular case?
Say, if the user actually used/configured ufw instead of the -persistent packages.

That seems possible, as users could have both installed previously, right?
(The bug report says both ufw/-persistent 'had no conflicts in jammy').

Thanks!

PS: I added an 'Other Info' section to the SRU template to clarify the 'fix released' in comment #1.