With Amazon EC2 autoscaling in place, it's not so easy to make changes to servers that were working until last week. Forcing people to switch to a newer release that comes with many differences is not a nice thing to do to people who chose Ubuntu vs, let's say, Amazon Linux AMI, just so that you can save a few dollars from your S3 bill, which possibly you don't pay anyway. Not supporting it and completely removing the packages are two different things. While I didn't expect package updates (even security ones) being EOL and I assumed the risk for that, I never expected packages to be completely removed and break my infrastructure so shortly after the EOL date.
Basically, the conclusion is: never use the recommended S3 repos and switch to main ones as S3 can only give you headaches. I understand that people should be using LTS releases, but those often are years behind and having to compile a bunch of packages is often impractical.
With Amazon EC2 autoscaling in place, it's not so easy to make changes to servers that were working until last week. Forcing people to switch to a newer release that comes with many differences is not a nice thing to do to people who chose Ubuntu vs, let's say, Amazon Linux AMI, just so that you can save a few dollars from your S3 bill, which possibly you don't pay anyway. Not supporting it and completely removing the packages are two different things. While I didn't expect package updates (even security ones) being EOL and I assumed the risk for that, I never expected packages to be completely removed and break my infrastructure so shortly after the EOL date.
Basically, the conclusion is: never use the recommended S3 repos and switch to main ones as S3 can only give you headaches. I understand that people should be using LTS releases, but those often are years behind and having to compile a bunch of packages is often impractical.