I notice you fallback to calling "umount -l" if "umount -R" failed when tearing down (see https://github.com/mwhudson/livefs-editor/blob/main/livefs_edit/context.py#L278)
This option was very tempting from the beginning but I fear, in the image building context, it will hide some hard to debug issues in the future.
I notice you fallback to calling "umount -l" if "umount -R" failed when tearing down (see https:/ /github. com/mwhudson/ livefs- editor/ blob/main/ livefs_ edit/context. py#L278)
This option was very tempting from the beginning but I fear, in the image building context, it will hide some hard to debug issues in the future.