Comment 4 for bug 890921

Martin, thank you for the bug report, your eagle eye in looking over this is most welcome and appreciated! My understanding is that what you've spotted is in relation to Section 3(ii) of the UFL-1.0 as published:

  http://font.ubuntu.com/ufl/ubuntu-font-licence-1.0.txt

  3) The name(s) of the Copyright Holder(s) and any contributor
     to the Font Software shall not be used … except …
       (ii) to acknowledge the contribution(s) of the Copyright Holder(s) or
       (iii) with their explicit written permission.

Looking at it, two possible alternate wording would either be to repeat the "any contributor" terminology:

       (ii) to acknowledge the contribution(s) of the contributor(s) and Copyright Holder(s), or

Alternatively to remove the explicit narrowing specification of "Copyright Holder(s)", per:

       (ii) to acknowledge the contribution(s) of the contributor(s) or

Would either of these be what you had in mind; can you suggest anything better?