Finalise .deb packaging

Bug #633508 reported by Paul Sladen on 2010-09-08
14
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Ubuntu Font Family
Undecided
Unassigned
ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu)
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

At the point that the pieces come together for distributing an openly-licensed version of the Ubuntu Font Family (bug #632411), the .deb package will require adjustment:

 * renaming from 'ubuntu-private-fonts' to eg. 'ttf-ubuntu-font-family'
 * including any documentation we've built up (eg. rationale for particular designs)
 * debian/copyright and license information
 * debian/changelog versioning (bug #632411)

Copied over from dup: The current packaging of the font can be improved in various ways to follow what it being done in the upstream pkg-fonts Debian Font Task Force:

- adding VCS-foo and VCS-browser fields to the upstream VCS
- adding bugreport scripts
- expanding the short and long descriptions
- adding a Homepage: field
- moving the section to the newly created dedicated fonts section
- making the copyright file DEP5 compliant when the licensing has been decided
- installing the FONTLOG and other relevant documentation to /usr/share/doc/$packagename
- dropping cdbs for better control over the specifics of font packaging
- adding a README.Source
- loosing the defoma dependency (obsolete and uneeded now)

Nicholas will take care of providing some of these packaging improvements when the VCS tree structure (bug #640526) is defined.

Paul Sladen (sladen) on 2010-09-08
Changed in ubuntu-font-family:
status: New → Confirmed
milestone: none → 0.7.0
description: updated
tags: added: uff-10.10-todo
Paul Sladen (sladen) on 2010-09-13
Changed in ubuntu-font-family:
milestone: 0.6.7 → 0.7.0
Paul Sladen (sladen) on 2010-09-20
description: updated
Nicolas Spalinger (yosch) wrote :

Some of these packaging changes are small and quickly done but they depend upon decisions in the orig tarball. Some of them are not entirely essential but I guess this can be improved after the initial release.

Nicolas Spalinger (yosch) wrote :

I've sent some packaging suggestions as a diff agains the current bzr repo. Let me know when and how I can help.

Paul Sladen (sladen) on 2010-09-28
Changed in ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu):
status: New → In Progress
Changed in ubuntu-font-family:
status: Confirmed → Invalid
Changed in ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Paul Sladen (sladen) wrote :

Matching patch from Nicolas above.

Paul Sladen (sladen) wrote :

Mostly done, will open new bug report for leftovers.

ubuntu-font-family-sources (0.68+ufl-0ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low

  * New upstream release 0.68+ufl: (LP: #629622, #633508)
    - Libre font, licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0 (LP: #632411)

  * New upstream release 0.68:
    - All
      + Version numbering agreed (LP: #633176, #629727)
      + The glyph at Unicode x1F5d was changed in all fonts, i.e. change
        of commaaccent in Greek glyph
      + Updated OS/2 table Strikethrough and 'post' table underline
        values to match thickness of underscore.
    - Italic / Bold Italic
      + The feminineordinal in the Italic now follows the design of
        the a, it has been updated and hinted.

  * New upstream release 0.67:
    - All
      + Version number forwarded to 0.67
    - Regular
      + Hinting adjustments for 15 - 18 ppm
      + Greek glyph uni1F5D has accent corrected.
      + Hinting amends for lowercase v, w and y in sizes 30 - 42
      + hdmx table include 120dpi ranges (LP: #608823)
      + Hinting amended to adjust for Freetype hint
        implementation. (LP: #614693)
    - Italic
      + Greek glyph uni1F5D has accent corrected.
    - Italic / Bold Italic:
      + lowercase f redesigned. (LP: #623925)
      + ae dipthong redesigned. (LP: #621157)

 -- Paul Sladen <email address hidden> Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:00:00 +0100

Changed in ubuntu-font-family:
milestone: 0.70 → 0.68
Changed in ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers