Is the fix still in some release pipeline? Or did it get lost?
> I'd have thought it was self-evident that the draft documentation is up to date. Perhaps it would be useful to include the bzr revision number somewhere.
A date of last update, or bzr revision number would provide very helpful information and add a confidence factor for viewers. I don't think the "draft" markings give a significant hint that something is up-to-date - old drafts litter the WWW.
This bug doesn't seem to have been resolved, even after the hardy docs have gone up. doc.ubuntu. com/ubuntu/ about-ubuntu/ C/index. html doc.ubuntu. com/ubuntu/ serverguide/ C/index. html
I.e. these pages:
http://
http://
still say they are 2 years old:
"Copyright © 2004, 2005, 2006 Canonical Ltd. and members of the Ubuntu Documentation Project"
Is the fix still in some release pipeline? Or did it get lost?
> I'd have thought it was self-evident that the draft documentation is up to date. Perhaps it would be useful to include the bzr revision number somewhere.
A date of last update, or bzr revision number would provide very helpful information and add a confidence factor for viewers. I don't think the "draft" markings give a significant hint that something is up-to-date - old drafts litter the WWW.