Comment 5 for bug 2012327

Yep - so when I originally created the merge proposal it didn't have the logic to sort by both the release stamp *and* the release name - so things with the same release stamp would get sorted in some random order with respect to each other. Now they sort with the name so bionic gets sorted before esm-apps/bionic - I had wondered if I should do something like 'if release name contains a / sort later than those that don't' but I couldn't figure out a good way to do that (although thinking about it more, perhaps we could just add 1 to the release stamp in that case so they look slightly newer?)