Comment 19 for bug 1040557

Dave Gilbert (ubuntu-treblig) wrote :

  I doubt it's generic to other vendors, but it's not too surprising that Samsung are sharing code among different models in their range, and I think uefi support is required for some systems, so it's difficult to remove, and at this point it's difficult to say exactly
which bit is broken.

  Thomas (and any of the other victims), can you confirm which version of unetbootin you used to generate the USB image?

(And as per Colin's comments in #17 any reports of it happening with something other than unetbootin would also be interesting).