Comment 12 for bug 818099

Revision history for this message
Marco Biscaro (marcobiscaro2112) wrote : Re: [Bug 818099] Re: packages.u.com uses pre-2010 branding

Em 21-01-2013 13:48, Gerfried Fuchs escreveu:
> Marco, please check whether I missed anything. Somehow the static files
> didn't get copied over automatically, so I had to do that by hand.

It looks like the about page (http://packages.ubuntu.com/about/) was not
updated.

> Just a side-note, I asked (a long time ago) already about someone who
> was willing to get the new branding for the packages site done - so I'm
> very grateful for you, Marco, to actually do it finally. :)

=)

> A small question though: Why did you throw away all css files and
> installed a new one? What's the reasoning behind that? Because actually,
> it might make future modifications a bit more trickier, don't you think
> so? Especially when new styles for some parts get added, and they are
> not represented in your ubuntu-new.css file?

Well, there was a LOT of CSS in the debian files. If I had modified
those files instead of creating a new one, probably when changed in
master, they would conflict. Moreover, probably we don't want changes
from debian CSS directly in packages.ubuntu.com, because probably they
will break things (and a manual review would be needed anyway).

IMO, it's better to implement new features from debian correctly (read
manually) instead of get them merged and have to fix them. What do you
think?