Reviewed: https://review.openstack.org/299287 Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/trove/commit/?id=a571e449178a5b3dbab75129c12175e3aaeb0a09 Submitter: Jenkins Branch: stable/liberty
commit a571e449178a5b3dbab75129c12175e3aaeb0a09 Author: Amrith Kumar <email address hidden> Date: Mon Mar 28 16:10:53 2016 -0400
Address change in Route v2.3
Routes v2.3 which just came out included a change (see the LP bug referenced below) that caused py27 to fail.
At issue is that Routes<2.3 allowed both
submapper.connect(route_name, route_path), and submapper.connect(route_path).
In 2.3, you were required to provide both route_name and route_path. This change adds a route_name to support both Routes < 2.3 and Routes == 2.3.
Change-Id: I8738d4dcac2cc37b727767ba614fab4339758e22 Closes-Bug: 1563028 (cherry picked from commit 6664fb27af2218c411230f91b8e23e72845cbf2a)
Reviewed: https:/ /review. openstack. org/299287 /git.openstack. org/cgit/ openstack/ trove/commit/ ?id=a571e449178 a5b3dbab75129c1 2175e3aaeb0a09
Committed: https:/
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch: stable/liberty
commit a571e449178a5b3 dbab75129c12175 e3aaeb0a09
Author: Amrith Kumar <email address hidden>
Date: Mon Mar 28 16:10:53 2016 -0400
Address change in Route v2.3
Routes v2.3 which just came out included a change (see the LP bug
referenced below) that caused py27 to fail.
At issue is that Routes<2.3 allowed both
In 2.3, you were required to provide both route_name and
route_path. This change adds a route_name to support both Routes < 2.3
and Routes == 2.3.
Change-Id: I8738d4dcac2cc3 7b727767ba614fa b4339758e22 411230f91b8e23e 72845cbf2a)
Closes-Bug: 1563028
(cherry picked from commit 6664fb27af2218c