K so, the proposed fix at [1] is ready for review please. Looks good to me.
Test at [2] to revert the non-voting
tripleo-ci-centos-8-9-multinode-mixed-os https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/8e102a09282c4a34b44fe69f60d11b82 : SUCCESS in 2h 24m 28s
And another test at [3] to make sure we didn't break the upgrade job with [1] and it looks good too
tripleo-ci-centos-9-undercloud-upgrade https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9e3e0239511c4df7acb589e0cf5d5b2a : SUCCESS in 1h 10m 45
[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/851516 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-tripleoclient/+/851384/1#message-0602119ad1e4abd8badebeebef4581763d2a1e8c [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-tripleoclient/+/851705/1#message-3e48aed929bb89189cd38a2430ad2e3fdd4f6478
K so, the proposed fix at [1] is ready for review please. Looks good to me.
Test at [2] to revert the non-voting
tripleo- ci-centos- 8-9-multinode- mixed-os https:/ /zuul.opendev. org/t/openstack /build/ 8e102a09282c4a3 4b44fe69f60d11b 82 : SUCCESS in 2h 24m 28s
And another test at [3] to make sure we didn't break the upgrade job with [1] and it looks good too
tripleo- ci-centos- 9-undercloud- upgrade https:/ /zuul.opendev. org/t/openstack /build/ 9e3e0239511c4df 7acb589e0cf5d5b 2a : SUCCESS in 1h 10m 45
[1] https:/ /review. opendev. org/c/openstack /tripleo- ci/+/851516 /review. opendev. org/c/openstack /python- tripleoclient/ +/851384/ 1#message- 0602119ad1e4abd 8badebeebef4581 763d2a1e8c /review. opendev. org/c/openstack /python- tripleoclient/ +/851705/ 1#message- 3e48aed929bb891 89cd38a2430ad2e 3fdd4f6478
[2] https:/
[3] https:/